Private equity firms are holding assets for longer than planned. As leverage and multiple expansion become less reliable sources of return, value creation increasingly depends on the collective effectiveness of leadership teams under pressure.
The issue is not simply whether individual executives are capable. It is whether the leadership system around the asset is aligned to the demands of the next phase of value creation: the sponsor, the board, the management team, the organisation and the external market context all pulling in the same direction.
Private equity firms have become sophisticated in how they create value. Operating partners, value creation teams, leadership assessment and technology transformation are now standard parts of the playbook. Yet many of these interventions still focus on capability in parts of the system, while paying less attention to how the senior leadership team, sponsor and board work together to turn the investment thesis into sustained execution.
With holding periods extending and traditional sources of value creation becoming less predictable, private equity firms are increasingly reliant on operational improvement, revenue growth and execution against the investment thesis.
Longer holding periods change the leadership requirement. The question becomes less about whether a team can deliver a near-term plan and more about whether it can keep adapting as the market, organisation and ownership agenda evolve.
Whether the management team can perform collectively under pressure is often assumed rather than tested.
The myth of the superstar executive
Private equity has historically been wired to identify exceptional individuals. The logic is understandable: if performance is lagging, replace the CEO; if a capability gap emerges, hire a stronger CFO; if growth stalls, bring in an experienced commercial leader.
While these interventions are often necessary, they are typically based on an assumption that organisational performance can be improved by upgrading individual roles. In practice, many portfolio companies are led by highly capable executives who are operating within a leadership system that does not yet enable them to act as a genuinely collective enterprise team.
The result is familiar: decision-making slows; functional leaders optimise their own priorities rather than enterprise-wide outcomes; friction develops between the portfolio company and the sponsor as they work from different assumptions about pace, risk and success; and momentum stalls.
At that point, the instinct is often to change the leadership team. But was the problem ever the individual?
The shift from individual excellence to collective effectiveness
One of the defining challenges in private equity is that value creation plans depend on collective execution across the leadership team, sponsor, board and organisation.
High-performing executive teams create value beyond the contribution of any individual member.
They make better decisions, resolve tensions faster, identify risks earlier and adapt more effectively when market conditions change. Most importantly, they execute strategy with greater consistency.
In today's market, that capability is becoming a critical value lever.
A growing challenge for private equity
The private equity model has long been built on pace. Historically, firms could rely on multiple expansion, leverage and relatively short holding periods to support returns. Today, many firms are holding assets for longer than originally anticipated, while operating in more uncertain economic conditions. This increases the importance and visibility of execution.
That challenge is becoming more visible. Research shows that 41% of private equity executives view the quality and retention of portfolio company leadership as a significant challenge. At the same time, unplanned leadership transitions continue to be costly and disruptive, particularly when they occur midway through a value creation programme.
For fund managers and operating partners, this raises an important question. What if leadership team effectiveness was treated as an execution risk to be diagnosed early, not a people issue to be addressed only after executive replacement becomes necessary?
Why Strategic Team Coaching is different
Strategic Team Coaching should be viewed in the same way as any other value creation lever: a structured intervention designed to improve the leadership conditions required to execute the investment thesis.
Unlike traditional leadership interventions focused on individuals, Strategic Team Coaching can be applied systematically across a portfolio, giving operating partners a repeatable mechanism for accelerating leadership team performance.
Strategic Team Coaching addresses the intersection between leadership, strategy, culture and execution by examining the broader system in which the team operates: the investment thesis, organisational capacity to deliver on objectives, stakeholder expectations and the relationship between the sponsor and portfolio company.
One of the largest sources of value leakage in private equity is not within the portfolio company itself but in the relationship between the sponsor and management team. Different incentives, time horizons and definitions of success can create friction that slows execution, even when both sides are acting rationally from their own perspective.
In a private equity environment, that context is critical. A leadership team cannot be assessed in isolation.
Expanding leadership capacity
Perhaps the most overlooked benefit of Strategic Team Coaching is its replicating impact on the organisation’s leadership capacity.
Senior leaders, investors and portfolio heads often take it for granted that the organisation will swiftly and effortlessly buy into the growth thesis and apply the level of effort required to achieve the value creation plan. This rarely happens without the knock-on effect of the leadership team re-evaluating itself and developing the leadership muscle it needs for the journey ahead.
Strategic Team Coaching helps with the need to expand the organisation’s leadership capacity by equipping senior leaders with a growth mindset that they can replicate with their teams.
It strengthens alignment around the investment thesis, improves communication between stakeholders and creates greater clarity around collective accountability. The result is not simply a more cohesive team. It is a team better equipped to deliver results and empower the organisation’s leaders, managers and employees.
A competitive advantage hiding in plain sight
The most sophisticated private equity firms have become highly effective at sourcing deals, structuring incentives and assessing leadership talent.
The next source of competitive advantage may be helping leadership teams out-perform their peer group once they are in place.
In today's private equity market, the performance of the leadership team within its broader ecosystem has become a critical value creation lever. Strategic Team Coaching offers firms a practical and scalable way to improve execution, reduce leadership-related risk and strengthen alignment between portfolio companies and sponsors.
As holding periods lengthen and execution becomes increasingly important, the firms that offer their leadership team a clear framework to maximise its collective performance early in the value creation stage may discover a competitive advantage hiding in plain sight.
_________________________________________________
Odgers provides integrated executive search and leadership advisory services. We are deeply rooted in our local markets, which we combine with global perspective and reach to help organisations build transformational, world-class leadership teams.
Get in touch. Follow the links below to learn more, or connect directly with our dedicated executive search experts and Sports leadership consultants at your local Odgers office here.
Never miss an issue
Subscribe to our global newsletter to discover our latest insights, opinions and featured articles.
Follow us
Join us on our social media channels and see how we're addressing today's biggest issues.